In what circumstance may a court impose restrictions on visitation?

A court may impose restrictions on visitation primarily when there is a concern that visitation would harm the child's health or safety. In scenarios where the child's emotional or physical well-being is at risk, the court takes these issues seriously and can adjust visitation rights accordingly. This is often based on evidence or findings that suggest interactions with the noncustodial parent may negatively affect the child, whether due to behavioral issues, substance abuse, domestic violence, or other harmful situations.

The determination is made with the child's best interests in mind, which is the primary focus of family law in New York and many other jurisdictions. When there are substantiated concerns about the potential for harm—be it physical, emotional, or psychological—the court will not hesitate to impose necessary restrictions or conditions on visitation to protect the child.

In contrast, other scenarios, such as the presence of a new partner in the noncustodial parent's life, the custodial parent’s disagreement, or nonpayment of child support, do not automatically justify limitations on visitation rights. The court typically views new relationships or parental disagreements as insufficient reasons to restrict visitation unless they have a direct and demonstrable impact on the child's well-being. Child support issues are also treated separately and are not a valid reason for limiting