Which factor is typically NOT considered by courts when evaluating a proposed relocation?

When evaluating a proposed relocation, courts focus on several factors that primarily concern the child's well-being and the implications of the move for the child's relationship with both parents. The correct answer identifies a factor that is generally viewed as less relevant to the best interests of the child in the context of relocation cases.

The relocating parent's job opportunities may significantly impact the family's financial stability, contributing to a better living situation for the child, thus making it a relevant consideration. Similarly, the child's friends and social network are crucial as maintaining these relationships can affect the child’s emotional well-being. Lastly, the child's age and needs are fundamental components in determining how a relocation would impact them, as these factors directly influence the child's ability to adapt to new environments and schools.

In contrast, the financial situation of the non-relocating parent, while important in the overall context of custody and child support, does not directly pertain to the child’s needs or the implications of the relocation itself. Courts prioritize the child's interests and well-being above the financial aspects of the non-relocating parent when deciding on relocation matters. Thus, the non-relocating parent's financial standing typically does not play a central role in such evaluations.